Syntagma Digital
21st-Century Phi
Mind Matters

Alcoholism and the Brain

Alcoholics have smaller brain volumes, probably due to the toxic effects of ethanol that causes the brain to shrink more with aging - but a new study shows that the brains of children of alcohol-dependent parents have reduced intracranial volume before they even take a drink.

Alcohol

The study by researchers at the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA), part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is the first to demonstrate that for children of alcoholics, brain size is affected before the onset of alcohol dependence.

Intracranial volume, or ICV, was found to be about 4 percent smaller in adult children of alcoholic parents than in adults who had no family history of alcoholism. IQ scores in alcoholic individuals whose parents were also alcoholic were found to average 5.7 points lower than in alcoholics whose parents were not alcohol-dependent.

The authors note that a possible implication of their findings is that the increased risk for alcoholism among children of alcoholics may be due to a genetic or environmental effect, or both, related to reduced brain growth.

“Although ICV is known to be influenced primarily by genetic factors,” says Dr. Daniel Hommer, senior author of the study,“many studies have found that living in an enriched environment promotes central nervous system growth and development. It seems likely that alcoholics, in general, are raised in less than optimal environments and thus that genetics and environment both contribute to the smaller ICV observed in family history positive alcoholics.”

Study Finds Reduced Brain Growth in Alcoholics with Family Drinking History

Learning To Think - Thinking To Learn

Teach students how to think for themselves and they will learn more and perform better. That’s the startling conclusion of Steve Rissing,a professor of evolution, ecology and organismal biology at Ohio State University, who presented his findings during a talk at the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Francisco.

First year biology students were previously being taught using what Rissing called the “cookbook method” which gave them step-by-step instructions on how to carry out an experiment and display their results. They were also provided with a standard, prepared enzyme solution.

Solving

Rissing conducted his own experiment, by dividing 300 students into two groups, one that used the cookbook method and a second group that was given less instruction and more room and freedom to use critical thinking and hands-on discovery. They also had to prepare their own enzyme solution from a piece of raw turnip.

Following the experiment, students were all asked one simple question “Where are enzymes found?” The answer is: from living tissue. Of the students in the cookbook group, only 23 percent got the right answer. But 83 percent of the students who had less instruction and therefore developed their own method, answered the question correctly.

The real discovery is that when allowed to discover and think, students increase knowledge and perform better than when given step-by-step instructions.

Rissing’s overarching goal is to teach students to be independent and objective thinkers, to create a group of scientifically literate citizens who can intelligently discuss multi-faceted issues such as stem cell biology, evolution, genetically modified organisms and the like. This applies to science majors and non-majors alike.

Scientific Literacy Happens…When Students Think for Themselves - Ohio State University Research News

Do you have a view? Leave a Comment

Think Chocolate

Chocolate lovers could be doing more than satisfying a craving, they could be boosting their cognitive powers. A study led by Professor Ian MacDonald at the University of Nottingham found that high levels of cocoa flavenols increased blood flow to key areas of the brain for 2 to 3 hours.

Choc

Flavenols are found in chocolate with high cocoa content as well as red wine, green tea and blueberries. For the study, participants ingested a special cocoa drink enriched with flavenols following which brain activity and blood flow to the brain was studied using MRI.

Professor Macdonald said: “Acute consumption of this particular flavanol-rich cocoa beverage was associated with increased grey matter flow for two to three hours.

“The demonstration of an effect of consuming this particular beverage on cerebral blood flow raises the possibility that certain food ingredients may be beneficial in increasing brain blood flow and enhancing brain function, in situations where individuals are cognitively impaired such as fatigue, sleep deprivation, or possibly ageing.”

The cocoa-rich flavenol drink was specially formulated for this study and is not available commercially.

Professor MacDonald presented his findings at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Boosting brain power - with chocolate

Do you have a view? Leave a Comment

Stress Limits Talent

Highly accomplished and talented people rely heavily on their working memory, a short-term memory system than maintains relevant information in an active state which can be accessed quickly. However, when under pressure, the stress and distractions interfere with their higher working memory and deplete cognitive resources.

Stress

Research done by Sian Beilock, Associate Professor of Psychology at the Universtiy of Chicago and presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, shows that when under pressure, talented people end up resorting to the same problem solving techniques used by lower performers. These methods can include guessing and estimating. Use of these strategies undermined the accuracy of those who normally perform at higher levels.

Students participating in the study were given mathematical tests and told they would be paid for right answers - but only if a partner, chosen randomly, also got the right answer. To increase the pressure, students were told their partners had solved the problem correctly.

Adding pressure had no effect on those whose working memory was more limited and their performance was no worse for the added stress. But for those who usually find their superior working memory to be an advantage, the addition of stress to the situation hampered their cognitive performance.

University of Chicago

Do you have a view? Leave a Comment